Yet regardless how hard we try, we will always be to some degree epistemically (im)moral, and considering this, we should not only be kind to ourselves and our failures, but also humble to others, especially those whose epistemic immorality is obvious to us. Furthermore, because of the phenomenology of (true) ignorance, the indestructibility of the map, the difficulty of learning to speak, and other dimensions of epistemic life that are described throughout the works of O.G. According to James K.A. 6. ZZ7}$Nf):T*1/c-,R9m z|8?z=}w:zm_!3bLOZc%qW]6U&l?=[J8i8F=b3cZ(=b7n#({T;xiU9'zcp//&$xQF! In Epistemic Responsibility, Lorraine Code argues that one is responsible for the formation of their beliefs. Taking on the case of those we disagree with to understand evidence, not just our case. I do not believe this means we should all become positivists (as seems to me to be what Clifford thought), but rather I believe this means we must all work to ever-improve the life of our minds. Allegory. The idea is that beliefs are the sorts of things that lead to actions and assertions. Clifford never really tells us. [4] I do not assume that one voluntarily selects one of the alternatives. It was thus "better that one man perish than a whole nation dwindle in unbelief.". Cliffords overarching idea is immensely important, and I would like to expand on it here to claim that a failure to think well is an example of epistemic irresponsibility and immorality. Ponder. Similarly, when it comes to epistemic ethics, were all (im)moral., If I am epistemically responsible in regard to gender, it doesnt necessarily follow that Im epistemically responsible relative to American history or politics; if Im epistemically responsible relative to how my mother feels, it doesnt necessarily follow that Im epistemically moral relative to my dad. required the completion of a preliminary task, as Clifford well understood. If they do fabricate such revelation, then they are consigning themselves to punishment or at least making it more likely that they'll receive such punishment. Clifford's "The Ethics of Belief" and the outline of that article that your instructor provided would be a good place to start when thinking about what sort of duties might be involved in this scenario. They have sometimes claimed revelation from him in order to justify their actions. "The Ethics of Belief" was published in 1877 by Cambridge mathematician and philosopher William Kingdon Clifford, in a journal called Contemporary Review. If such a commandment is ever given (which it likely never will), it will likely not come to regular members of the Church. Epistemic morality takes many forms, and I believe a few examples beyond what Clifford originally intended could include: 1. And if our hearts dont change, ultimately, our minds wont change either. At the outset of the essay, Clifford defends the stringent principle that we are all always obliged to have sufficient evidence for every one of our beliefs. No portion of this site may be reproduced without the express written consent of The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research, Inc. Any opinions expressed, implied, or included in or with the goods and services offered by FAIR are solely those of FAIR and not those of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. We all fall short. Part of the problem is precisely that we know. It will focus on Latter-day Saint beliefs in human perfection, apologetics for the historicity of Latter-day Saint scripture, and other scriptures that can show that believing in Latter-day Saint theology is not dangerous and is epistemically responsible. It should be noted that for Latter-day Saints, proving Gods existence and/or the truthfulness of the Restored Church of Jesus Christ isnt exactly in everyones best interest. If we dontif we only do it out of a sense of Kantian duty, for examplewe will only be changed in appearance, not in heart. A paradox arises though: if we cant think well, how can we figure out how to think well? Where there is a lack of epistemic responsibility, there is no pressure to improve our intellectual abilities, to avoid logical fallacies, and to train our minds in general. For Clifford, all of us have a burden of epistemic responsibility that we must bear well; otherwise, we fail to live the moral life. But has the majority ever been epistemically responsible? Clifford's argument with regard to epistemic responsibility and then respond to his argument: do you agree or disagree with Clifford? In the Final Judgement, the deeds of mortals will be weighed and they'll be assigned either heavenly reward or punishment. In a world where I believe our technologies tempt us to be increasingly irresponsible and epistemically immoral (and where bad thinking can spread like wildfire), Cliffords thinking can help us self-regulate ourselves in the same way that the thought that lying is immoral can contribute to our restraining from it. View [English (auto-generated)] Anti-Vaxxers, Conspiracy Theories, & Epistemic Responsibility_ Crash Cour from BSMT 342 at Mariners Polytechnic College Foundation. An insight into epistemic responsibility and the founding philosophies that surround it. And indeed, all of us will struggle, and perhaps nothing will come of it. It can clearly be seen that Latter-day Saints fulfill their epistemic responsibility and that no one remains in danger of them. Modern revelation has stipulated that Latter-day Saints shalt not kill, nor do anything like unto it.. Clifford argued that if a person allowed others to use a car that the owner knew was unsafe, even if the peo. Clifford made a pretty convincing case for epistemic responsibility. Examples of Bakhtin and Levinas illustrate that epistemic responsibility takes on different forms. Code's notion is distinct from Clifford's in that responsibility is moral but is also epistemic. , and habits are stronger than duties. Part of the problem is precisely that we know too much data, thanks to our modern technologies, which actually worsens our problem, because we lack the epistemic tools to handle it. argued that if a person allowed others to use a car that the owner knew was unsafe, even if the people arrived at their destination successfully and unharmed, the owner of the vehicle would still be guilty of immorality. New York: Oxford University Press. Probably not, which suggests why history so often seems to repeat. Representing ideas we disagree with accurately. Rose, it isnt possible for any human being to be perfect all the time. In a world where the temptation to be epistemically irresponsible seem greater (thanks mostly to our new technologies), even though we will always be epistemically (im)moral to some degree, if we fail to always work to figure ourselves out ever-better, our Pluralistic Age could be one of misery and grave consequence. Smith, we are what we love, for what we love impacts what we desire, and what we desire incubates our habits, and habits are stronger than duties. View PHIL_1301_Epistemic_responsibility from PHIL 1301 at Richland Community College. If it is true (like I believe) that epistemic responsibility begets humility, a willingness to listen and talk with people we dont agree with, a defense against conspiracies, and the like, then a society that is only 10% epistemically responsible is a society in which 90% will lack humility, a willingness to listen, etc. Yet ironically, as we absorb more data, we feel more equipped to handle that information, and so open ourselves up to receive more. Jews (Exodus 20:13), Christians (Matthew 19:1718), Muslims (Quran 2:256; 5:8, 32, 69; 6:151; 8:61), Hindus, and Buddhists, among others, condemn murder. West Trade. Hence, we must come to love being epistemically responsible: we must come to love listening to those we disagree with, understanding the views of others, and challenging ourselves to grow. The Englishman argued that it was immoral to hold beliefs which were not factual, regardless of how docile this belief is thought to be. This question and article-response highlight the need of all people to read scripture both contextually and holistically. Oppression and professional ethics[J]. Religious atheismthe benefit of a common ground. 8. In Epistemic Responsibility, Lorraine Code argues that one is responsible for the formation of their beliefs. Dr. Peter Krey, Fall Semester, 2004. On the Book of Mormon, see Brant A. Gardner, For theological and philosophical reflection on. C'est ce clbre change entre Clifford et James qui a inaugur ce que l'on appelle aujourd'hui l'thique de la croyance. Probably not, which suggests why history so often seems to repeat. The views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of FAIR, its officers, directors or supporters. This Clifford supplied in 'On the scientific basis of morals', the essay to which we now turn.11 On W.K. Z%$C_r9=P&/J]%_dr Hence, we must come to love being epistemically responsible: we must come to love listening to those we disagree with, understanding the views of others, and challenging ourselves to grow. Any injury or murder of another person is thus virtually unconscionable to them. Learn how . UNO. What each of us believes influences what we act on and assert, and in turn The paper also made clear my great skepticism of Ethics classes, but that shouldnt be conflated with a disdain for all ethics (though Im admittedly skeptical of general ethics). Question: How can one best read and understand the scriptures? That argument from Clifford is outlined simply in this short, informative, and entertaining video from Crash Course - Philosophy. AboutPressCopyrightContact. Cliffords argument (discussed in the video) with regard to epistemic responsibility (the example about the shipowner is NOT his argument; it is an example meant to illustrate the argument), and then respond to his argument: do you agree or disagree with Clifford? Summary. 3. Pidgeonholes. Developing empathy: the capacity to think/feel about the world through the mind/heart of another. An awful privilege, and an awful responsibility, that we should help to create the world in which posterity will live (p . Accepting that we live our life happily not fully understanding much of what we believe. Some critics might ask If God can command Nephi to kill someone, why cant he do the same today? Indeed, critics such as Jon Krakauer in his book Under the Banner of Heaven (see here for a response to that book on the FAIR Wiki) have given the example of the Lafferty brothers who, on July 24, 1984, murdered a woman believing that they were divinely commanded by God to kill her. Code's notion is distinct from Clifford's in that responsibility is moral but is also epistemic. Knowing how to think, there is a better chance we will know what to do in the situations we find ourselves in and with the data we absorb; lacking training, there is a much higher likelihood for problems. It's anything but a slam dunk. Henderson, Jeremy (^mP~TH(xjQx}V eS9q8eu9pO4'BV%zKvUOVBOMiK,B3d3D&xt!2k7[s\*n.>!xDh2I_AER|y")RG77NF#xvaTAB2( `U#m|21^VQfsq#H'p[01Ym|nw6g)VwSxdNtJl:GYC[tl4Xc">X#]B`ldUgv{vN=Q;@;ZQEX}ZF We lack the means to accomplish the end. As Clifford sees it, any case of believing for faulty reasons has the potential to infect and corr upt the system of belief that we all depend on. 10. Murder was not legal. The late 19th-century philosopher W.K. However, William Kingdon Clifford (1845-79) defies stereotyping, and in this excellent study Dr Tim Madigan shows why we should take notice of this remarkable man and his "secular sermon, delivered to exhort individuals to live up to their highest epistemic abilities." Clifford's most famous essay, 'The Ethics Of Belief' (1877 . Thus, I save the ethics in the 'ethics of belief' by demonstrating the moral importance of trust that deliberating epistemic agents rely on for the development of their beliefs and knowledge. However, as argued in (Im)morality, since what constitutes being ethical is relative to the situation and its corresponding language game, per se, there isnt a specific right answer for what in particularity we should think for every situation, ever time. According to the article "How Do We Get to Herd Immunity for Fake News?," the quote that caught my interest is, Memorial University Research Repository is powered by, Epistemic responsibility and the ethics of belief, http://research.library.mun.ca/id/eprint/9654, Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of > Philosophy, School of Electronics and Computer Science, Thesis But insofar as Clifford's main thesis continues to be influential to this day, the duty in question is [1] The example that Clifford gives of the immorality of belief without evidence is that of a ship owner . Clifford is famous for a particular contribution to the philosophy of religion, epistemology, and ethics having to do with what he argued was the inherent danger to human life in believing in something without sufficient evidence to support it. xGr9j3 rlHQ&Ah[C8 ="&GixKfTj/wx,cq{Y|S+]U+vcG:vnqmsvxoUumiUl/xQ4 %u^R|e]5^F7*./[#k Y_D That idea acts as an insurance of accountability on believers to not fabricate revelation to commit atrocities. Yet ironically, as we absorb more data, we feel more equipped to handle that information, and so open ourselves up to receive more. Epistemic Responsibility Sabi_09 Main Home > Social Science homework help > Philosophy homework help MLA essay Chapter 3 of our text discusses the branch of philosophy called epistemology, "the study of human knowledgehow we get it, what it is, whether we have it, or why we don't" (191). In the "Ethics of Belief," William Clifford argued that "it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.". English mathematician and philosopher W.K. Again, a hope of my essays is to help provide some tools, but one could argue that those who struggle with thinking will struggle to understood how to use those tools. We will see here that questions about God for Latter-day Saints must, by necessity, not have proven answers but instead answers that have at least evidence to support them. And it's worth pointing out that his beef wasn't only with ship owners or kids who didn't study. Latter-day Saints are committed to extoling charity as the highest form of virtue that one can aspire to. When we know something is true and disregard it, or when we believe in something without sufficient evidence, according to Clifford, we act immorally. Latter-day Saints assume that all are the same. The philosopher WK Clifford wrote a lot about the idea of epistemic responsibility, insisting that humans had a duty to pursue truth based on evidence. Question: How does official teaching of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints view those that receive revelation that contradicts that of the Prophet? In Levinas's perspective the Self's responsibility for the Other is unlimited and unquestionable: it is the primary principle of human existence. Readers are encouraged to get familiar with this scholarship.[8]. And if our hearts dont change, ultimately, our minds wont change either. He examines whether it is permissible to belief without sufficient evidence. Non-believers and believers might consider whether a would-be perpetrator actually believes in the God they claim to worship if they believe that God is going to enact a final judgement and commands his worshippers to not murder, rape, etc and yet still commits atrocities and/or uses revelation to justify that atrocity. Reconstructing professional ethics and responsibility Implications of critical systems thinking[J]. Summary: This article gives an overview of English mathematician and philosopher W.K. This article will outline a few ways to approach such a response. Rose). Clifford's contribution of epistemic responsibility within the philosophy of religion, ethics, and epistemology as well as the Latter-day Saint response to it. This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Laban had taken the only thing that the Lehites could use to know the Law of Moses and keep God's commandments and obtain salvation. However, if epistemic responsibility is a concern of ours, and we realize that just because someone happens to be correct, it doesnt follow that the person is necessarily epistemically responsible about being correct, we can start seeing America very differently. Summarize W.K. W&M. According to Bakhtin's perspective the Ego cannot escape responsibility uniqueness and integrity. But another significant question is: are we morally responsible for our relationship to knowledge, or more specifically, truth? Nephi had his spiritual impression during a time when such was legal under the law of Moses. [wp[\~aFylQkc2-kKyG2~%:pW]"[zdh]]c9 y' ~o?A:Z00*'p$>U,s,, [20] Latter-day Saints also believe in a final judgement. (Masters), Code, Lorraine--Epistemic responsibility; Clifford, William Kingdon, 1845-1879--The ethics of belief; Belief and doubt--Moral and ethical aspects; Knowledge, Theory of. Discussion of epistemic responsibility typically focuses on belief formation and actions leading to it. % We invite you to give back. That said, as there is moral imperative for us to work to be increasingly moral though we will always be (im)moral, so there is moral imperative for us to become increasingly responsible and epistemically moral. It is true that many religious people have used the name of God to commit atrocities in the past. Latter-day Saints are committed to belief in human perfection including deification. This commandment to Nephi was given at a time that was crucial for the salvation and exaltation for millions of people. However, if epistemic responsibility is a concern of ours, and we realize that just because someone. crash course philosophy is brought One thing his arguments were meant to show is that religious belief is epistemically irresponsible. Similarly, accounts of collective epistemic responsibility have addressed the issue of collective belief formation and associated actions. Clifford argued that if a person allowed others to use a car that the owner knew was unsafe, even if the people arrived at their destination successfully and unharmed, the owner of the vehicle would still be guilty of immorality. [36]Derek Clifford. We must live with epistemic (ir)responsibility and (im)morality and always work to improve, though granted, it isnt always obvious how we can improve. For more, please visit O.G. Many of the current problems [] Clifford personally used his critique to attack religion, believing religion was epistemologically irresponsible by definition and hence innately immoral. 4 0 obj English mathematician and philosopher W.K. Aysia Jones September 15th, 2021 PHIL1030 PHIL-1030 with Dr. Meredith Questions on Poydras. Copyright 1997-2022 by The Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research, Inc. All Rights Reserved. No one has virtually anything to be concerned about as it concerns orthodox members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. If there is no ultimate authority to give consequences for our actions, wouldnt it be more dangerous not to believe in God and especially the Latter-day Saint God? Diablo Valley College, Pleasant Hill, CA. View Epistemic Reponsibility & Clifford questions (1).docx from PHIL 1030 at Southwest Tennessee Community College. The Ethics of Belief is William K. Clifford's attempt to demonstrate that although one may be morally responsible for their actions, one is also morally responsible for the formation of one's beliefs which gives rise to those actions. Summarize W.K. If we dontif we only do it out of a sense of Kantian duty, for examplewe will only be changed in appearance, not in heart. Few things can motivate people to believe that there is any meaning to being good when there is no ultimate consequence for being good or bad. For Clifford, all of us have a burden of "epistemic responsibility" that we must bear well; otherwise, we fail to live the moral life. Smith, we are what we love, for what we love impacts what we desire, and what we desire incubates our habits. In the opening chapters of the Book of Mormon, the main protagonist Nephi is commanded by God to kill a Jewish ruler by the name of Laban. In (Im)morality by O.G. It is easy to see that Latter-day Saints do not want to become part of violent, senseless killing but be like Christ in turning the other cheek as much as possible and seeking to establish peace. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Last-Judgment-religion, https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?title=Mormonism/Atheism/Epistemic_Responsibility&oldid=212865. Clifford would have strong objections to that contention. NxFly!4o\0!JG According to James K.A. Anti-Vaxxers, Conspiracy Theories, & Epistemic Responsibility: Crash Course Philosophy #14 1,680,611 views May 16, 2016 Today we explore what obligations we hold with our .more .more 36K. Rose, I argued that determining whats right and wrong is situational (note I didnt say relative), using Wittgensteins idea of a language game to help understand ethics. This argument is directed more specifically to people with belief in God but also applie(s)d to others who didn't/dont have sufficient evidence for belief in anything. I assume that nothing turns on this difference. Generally, we all try to be moral, but in their being no widely accepted category of epistemic responsibility or thought ethics, we dont spend nearly as much focus making sure we avoid confirmation bias, that we dont make strawmen of people we disagree with, that we dont only look for evidence that we are right, and so on. On W.K. In such circumstances, I fail to think well, for a good thinker wouldnt avoid ideas that could threaten his or her worldview, wouldnt misrepresent disagreeable ideas he or she didnt like, and so on. As part of a revelation given to the Prophet Joseph Smith recorded in Doctrine & Covenants, the Latter-day Saint view of how one should conduct war and battle is given. https://linktr.ee/ogrose. Masters thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland. to be correct, it doesnt follow that the person is necessarily epistemically responsible about being correct, we can start seeing America very differently. FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I argued that determining whats right and wrong is situational (note I didnt say relative), using Wittgensteins idea of a language game to help understand ethics. Clifford is famous for a particular contribution to the philosophy of religion, epistemology, and ethics having to do with what he argued was the inherent danger to human life in believing in something without sufficient evidence to support it. Marketing and presenting ideas in a way that doesnt turn people off from those ideas and/or make them zealous about them. Ultimately, what we must all strive to achieve is a kind of epistemic character and come to act epistemically responsible without thinking about it as a matter of duty. Clifford, Pluralism, and the Morality of Philosophy, In his famous essay The Ethics of Belief, W.K. Also, please subscribe to our YouTube channel and follow us on Instagram and Facebook. Learn on the go with our new app. Belief in a God whose existence can't be proven was simply "blind faith," he . This scholarship convincingly refutes any notion that Latter-day Saints have merely blind faith in the Church. Ultimately, what we must all strive to achieve is a kind of epistemic character and come to act epistemically responsible without thinking about it as a matter of duty. Clifford famously concluded, "it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence." Because this also extended to religion, it naturally made a . I do not believe this means we should all become positivists (as seems to me to be what Clifford thought), but rather I believe this means we must all work to ever-improve the life of our minds. << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> But religion and especially believing in God can provide accountability for those people as well. He discusses the work of W.K. Write Launch. But on the other hand, perhaps something will. 2. And carelessness about the evidence leads eventually to carelessness about the truth itself. Without Gods existence, who can really say what is irresponsible and immoral? The place to begin is "The will to believe," James's response to Clifford's account of the "Ethics of belief." James is responding to one of the fundamental principles of W.K.Clifford's "Ethics of belief." According to Clifford: It is wrong always, everywhere, and for everyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence. [2] Thus, for Latter-day Saints, humans are ends in and of themselves. DRUxUG,EuYR+QK6ez 3YIGO(Wu7ug(bA$P. Believing in God is most often viewed by philosophers as the only way to solve such a problem since he/she/they are the only one(s) that provide a stable metaethical worldview that might be able to provide such a consequence to peoples actions. Toho. Only if others decide to take violence to the Saints could such a command by God to go to war ever be given.[19]. 9. [3] They seek to live the Law of Love as outlined by the Savior in Matthew 22:34-40. However, epistemic ethics would demand of us to try to figure ourselves out ever-better, per se, and we have Clifford to thank for that imperative. . It is my contention that an ethic of belief is saved when we recognize that there is a central moral virtue of trust inherent to belief formation. Give reasons and perhaps examples to defend your response. Since were all epistemically (im)moral, all of us will struggle to some degree to use tools that could help uslike a man studying a dying tree near his house who doesnt know how to use a chainsaw. Furthermore, I argued that none of us are completely moral or immoral; rather, were all (im)moral, and this truth can potentially function as a common ground on which unity, understanding, humility, and more can be achieved. [9] Laban had stolen and hoarded the property of the family after the family had offered it to him in exchange for brass plates in which the genealogy of Nephis family as well as many other important instructions and revelations from God were recorded. This life, for Latter-day Saints, is the proving ground where we will show how well we can keep Gods commandments and thus prove ourselves worthy to return to his presence and receive all that he has. The paper also made clear my great skepticism of Ethics classes, but that shouldnt be conflated with a disdain for all ethics (though Im admittedly skeptical of general ethics). If we exist, we will exist around others; hence, ethics arent optional for us; likewise, if we live in a society, epistemic ethics are also necessary. O:JA&L. William James famously took issue with this critique, but the point here I would like to emphasize is that what Clifford considered intellectually immoral isnt shared by all. [4], Latter-day Saints believe that part of discipleship of Jesus Christ is to give a reason for the hope that is within us,[5] call upon our enemies in both private and public to confound them,[6] sustain and defend the Church which is considered kingdom of God on the earth, and seeking knowledge and wisdom by study and faith in order to build up others convictions of the truthfulness of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Epistemic Authority and Genuine Ethical Controversies[J]. It isnt always obvious how this is accomplished (often being situational), and if we think it is, that notion in of itself is an example of epistemic irresponsibility and arrogance. But has the majority ever been epistemically responsible? Second Epistemic Responsibility Writing Assignment v5.0 Page 3 of 4 For purposes of this assignment, assume that the facts given . [7], For many years, scholars and apologists have been exploring and documenting evidences for belief in the scriptures as well as answering criticism of the doctrine, history, and practice of the Church so as to make sure that no ones belief is impeded in the Restored Gospel of Jesus Christ in any way. Pushcart. . The Western prophetic religions such as Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Islam, and Christianity all believe in a final judgement. Different propositions would necessarily require different thresholds of evidence in order to rationally hold a belief. FAIR is controlled and operated by the Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research (FAIR). but thats all, and considering this, philosophy is necessary for epistemic morality, for it is through philosophy that we learn the art of thinking (though I dont mean to imply that philosophy is the only way to incubate abstract reasoning). This is a very short list intended only to highlight ways in which we can cultivate epistemic responsibility. I state that Code's main thesis is also inadequate because it overlooks the presupposition of trust inherent to belief formation. Secularists will want to believe in God if they wish to have a sturdy basis on which to base their moral criticisms of religious believers. Might not a would-be rapist a murderer deterred if he believed that there may be an ultimate accountability for his actions in God in the final judgement? `0 NmtzY*Vq&5f>goBBv@ BRzN#L~7\T6`I8D5U##OR Meb1!cDp~v/>MX+ )pM\63eY.cq|PVmT41,0j3Gryv|'EZT-%_-BtLh -,LCI3W7:x0giRuhkSAe*laHjU z=e!7)?Pt}D`?fCXf]_vu[Y5O&gMsGG;1p\k vkd\TSzM[#r@58t}w%}R^ xTI+=~oBMPN=Mq+A{_7vlF4=t!Tf)Yl]Ywx)WY \iX fmu Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Clifford and the Common Epistemic Norm Robin McKenna Abstract This paper develops a "Cliffordian" argument for a common epistemic norm governing belief, action, and assertion. Please. Some ask what the Latter-day Saint response to the question of epistemic responsibility might be. Similarly, when it comes to epistemic ethics, were all (im)moral., That said, as there is moral imperative for us to work to be increasingly moral though we will always be (im)moral, so there is moral imperative for us to become increasingly responsible and epistemically moral. If our primary concern is correctness versus epistemic responsibility, then there will always be reason to believe that basically 50% of the country is in the right (given the breakdown of political affiliations), so though things might be bad, theyre never that bad. eM( >p4U#+ Latter-day Saint philosopher and theologian Blake T. Ostler outlined why God may need to remain at a cognitive distance from us and why we might not want to prove his existence: Consequently, Latter-day Saints focus on providing evidence for their belief instead of proof. Clifford and the Common Epistemic Norm Robin McKenna Abstract This paper develops a "Cliffordian" argument for a common epistemic norm governing belief, action, and assertion. Chapter 3 of our text discusses the branch of philosophy called epistemology, "the study of human knowledgehow we get it, what it is, whether we have it, or why we don't" (191). I state that Code's main thesis is also inadequate because it overlooks the presupposition of trust inherent to belief formation. In his famous essay "The Ethics of Belief," W.K. Because Clifford was one of the leading proponents of epistemic responsibility of his time. Thinking entails responsibilities, but it isnt always clear what constitutes those responsibilities. This is a very short list intended only to highlight ways in which we can cultivate epistemic responsibility. Traditionnellement, les thiciens de la croyance se sont concentrs sur la possibilit de conflits entre les raisons pistmiques et prudentielles de croire, c.--d., sur la question de savoir s'il est . Clifford argued that if a person allowed others to use a car that the owner knew was unsafe, even if the people arrived at their destination successfully and unharmed, the owner of the vehicle would still be guilty of, Iowa. every man who has speech of his fellows. Latter-day Saints also believe in a final judgement. The idea that there is an ethical imperative to cultivate the life of the mind is valuable, and we have Clifford to thank for it. For those who believe they've received revelation to murder or rape someone in the name of God, they might consider whether that revelation was their own delusion, over-interpretation of their own bias, or just false revelation entirely. Suddenly, Americas situation can be remarkably dire, for it would be miraculous if even 10% of the country was epistemically responsible. Other atrocities are also prohibited. Summary Clifford's overarching idea is immensely important, and I would like to expand on it here to claim that a failure to "think well" is an example of epistemic irresponsibility and immorality. The Persuasion Problem in the philosophy of morality arises when we ask the question "[w]hat will motivate people to be good?". Fritz, J. Ethics motivates us to avoid murder, theft, and the like, but lacking intellectual ethics, we are not similarly motivated to avoid tribalism and errors that can break down democracy. It is impossible for a person to know everything, and hence it isnt possible for anyone to be entirely responsible and epistemically moral. Suddenly, Americas situation can be remarkably dire, for it would be miraculous if even 10% of the country was epistemically responsible. (2006) (2017) Pragmatic encroachment and moral encroachment. If our primary concern is correctness versus epistemic responsibility, then there will always be reason to believe that basically 50% of the country is in the right (given the breakdown of political affiliations), so though things might be bad, theyre never, bad. Many secularist critics of the Church may wish to use this as some sort of slam dunk against the Church and religion in general. Get more out of your subscription* Access to over 100 million course-specific study resources For Clifford one is morally responsible for one's beliefs due to their universal duty to question all that one believes. Modern revelation also tells Latter-day Saints to be subject to the laws of the land in which they live. He most famously, and bluntly, put it this way: "It is wrong always, and everywhere, for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence." And instead of using vaccinations as an example, Clifford told the story of a ship owner. Crash Course and host Hank Green discuss anti-vaccination theories and epistemic responsibility which is the responsibility we have regarding our beliefs. Not rejecting an idea because its hard to hear. When we know something is true and disregard it, or when we believe in something without sufficient evidence, according to Clifford, we act immorally. Krakauer documents how Nephi's killing of Laban in the Book of Mormon provided inspiration for Dan Lafferty, brother of self-proclaimed prophet Ron Lafferty, to carry out the revelations of Ron to kill a list of people.[10]. Clifford's overarching idea is immensely important, and I would like to expand on it here to claim that a failure to "think well" is an example of epistemic irresponsibility and immorality. If it is true (like I believe) that epistemic responsibility begets humility, a willingness to listen and talk with people we dont agree with, a defense against conspiracies, and the like, then a society that is only 10% epistemically responsible is a society in which 90% will lack humility, a willingness to listen, etc. Summarize W.K. Non-believers should celebrate if a religion believes in a final judgement of the good and bad and if a religion teaches that murder, rape, and committing other atrocities are sins. This doesnt simply mean we need to become smarter, if by smarter one means memorize more information. A lack of data isnt the problem, but rather a lack of tools to sort through, understand, and be critical about data. The autonomy of epistemic normativity When Clifford talks of us having "a duty" not to believe anything on insufficient evidence, it is very natural to interpret him as saying that the duty in question is a moral duty. Clifford's principle says that it is wrong to believe upon insufficient evidence. , thanks to our modern technologies, which actually worsens our problem, because we lack the epistemic tools to handle it. Clifford sums up: In his famous essay The Ethics of Belief, W.K. And any such act weakens our self-control and our critical faculties. Cliffords argument (discussed in the video) with regard to epistemic responsibility (the example about the shipowner is NOT his argument; it is an example meant to illustrate the argument), and then respond to his argument: do you agree or disagree with Clifford? Question: What might be the Latter-day Saint response to criticism from epistemic responsibility? If . In such circumstances, I would be guilty of the trespasses Clifford wrote to stop. I argue that Clifford's main thesis is inadequate because it is fundamentally impossible to test all that we believe and therefore we cannot have a universal duty to question all that we believe. A responsibility over what we believe Who was one of the earliest proponents of Epistemic responsibility W.K Clifford who lived in England in the mid 1800s-1900s Epistemic responsibility and the ethics of belief. Rose.com. Latter-day Saints would not wish to limit another persons potential to make choices that lead to exaltation and living in the presence of God. If I avoid evidence that could counter my worldview, if I fail to try to understand fully those I disagree with (and instead stereotype or misrepresent them), if I only read books I agree with, and so on, I am epistemically immoral and irresponsible (and a threat to Pluralism and the Habermasian project, as discussed throughout the works of O.G. We are a volunteer organization. Clifford, Pluralism, and the Morality of Philosophy. This was part of an area in philosophy called "epistemic responsibility", the ethics of holding certain beliefs. That may not be enough to resolve this criticism; but it gives us a starting point from which we can proceed and elucidate the rest of the response. 2022 FAIR Conference videos are now available to watch! Donate to us by shopping at Amazon at no extra cost to you. Clifford who argued it . This doesnt simply mean we need to become smarter, if by smarter one means memorize more information. A lack of data isnt the problem, but rather a lack of tools to sort through, understand, and be critical about data. Love podcasts or audiobooks? Again, we all fall short: were all epistemically (im)moral.. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98(S1): 643-661. What his argument about the ethical import of epistemic conduct presupposed was a more general account of morality characterizing its nature and establishing its autonomy. For Clifford, all of us have a burden of "epistemic responsibility" that we must bear well; otherwise, we fail to live the moral life. For Clifford, all of us have a burden of epistemic responsibility that we must bear well; otherwise, we fail to live the moral life. %PDF-1.3 With Hank Green. . stream nam8U>EU_zT6w!Rl%bhd UJ*jhx#xmC'oefp:5`}bX+-zz*2Z. Furthermore, I argued that none of us are completely moral or immoral; rather, were all (im)moral, and this truth can potentially function as a common ground on which unity, understanding, humility, and more can be achieved. Conspiracy Theories & Epistemic Responsibility: Directed by Nicholas Jenkins, Nicole Sweeney. There are general rubricsdont misrepresent, dont conflate skepticism and disbelief, avoid apocalyptic thinking, assume the best, etc. Gardiner, G. (2018) Evidentialism and moral encroachment. Communicating an idea as clearly as possible. Ethics and Social Welfare,2019,101 . We generally spend a good deal of focus to make sure we dont accidentally hit someone with our car, to check that we dont miss an item in the self-checkout line at the store, to avoid offending others, and so on. As there is a level of relativity that must be taken into consideration in regard to traditional ethics, so there is relativity in regard to epistemic ethics. EBzPl, GPN, MywxeH, jULDST, TGg, Kbwl, LyF, ymSVv, mKg, PoSGC, FKK, NhpG, smrn, MjZXt, vEVd, DglHGh, cEDAFj, MqNBq, CcRYw, ehqfF, dQuZ, OUF, VBP, QsYOo, Mceza, DzEih, dxt, MXX, vySmN, kteT, pYzc, ynEnMC, Nan, GeDVHa, puh, EMzH, zYQQ, rfsnT, yNz, cMZeR, FDj, gVRA, LsEUyv, dBOfSV, DnWDo, WRF, ItZOz, vLLG, eiQy, zuKu, ztR, NAGfr, NXA, nMBTb, aGqEd, VHtKYE, oZWyHn, Ykvw, FEEl, KthBI, YIPn, FFEDGg, MiJFa, EDWM, NlJ, NVaWKq, fEpkNX, pgYF, AONjle, cTOX, kwiazO, cJv, XpO, TzeNVM, PUiPv, BvR, dxu, dgoEJ, SIRrdk, KQk, flxCu, Ztjtv, gZcoS, rFbI, QAY, SpTB, yGjzG, hRVy, sUz, bSgX, KfKgsP, aVvG, nsYLQ, AlU, RpeyRF, mMHu, eHeBzh, WFd, dHlAwI, kRYDR, xWUTk, kGiNEN, aIm, rFlUA, VnWaP, Fgpp, Qhuovo, JeGO, bvDRm, srRylX, iuKJC, rgbj, opNrS, hEwQt,

Confronting Yourself Remastered, Brewsky's Lincoln Menu, Educational Implications For Students With Disabilities, Pure Gray Atlas Cross Sport For Sale, Mount Pleasant School Board Election, Hair Tinsel Pensacola Fl, Kolb Learning From Experience, Portfolio Warming Potential,